Kurbijkurne forums: Soli tuvāk fantāzijai

Laipni lūdzam, viesi ( Pieteikties | Reģistrēties )

> Talking about Tolkien - forum rules (noteikumi)

Foruma pamatvaloda – angļu. Ja nepieciešams, palīdzību tulkošanā vari lūgt modiem.

Communication on this forum – basically in English.

Šiame forume bendraujama angliškai.

Käesolevas foorumis toimub suhtlus inglise keeles.

> Debating rules, Debašu noteikumi
Nimue
iesūtīt 07.02.2005 15:46
Raksts #1


Istari māceklis
*****

Grupa: Biedri
Pievienojās: 29.12.03
GP eksperts 2006



For everyone willing to participate in discussion about debate rules - the discussion is there
When the rules will be written, they will be posted here.
----------------------
Diskusija par debašu noteikumiem norisinās lietuviešu forumā. Ja vēlaties kaut ko piebilst - principā, varat jau to darīt arī šeit, iespējams, ka Nuluks pēc tam svarīgāko pārstāstīs tur. Kad noteikumi būs gatavi, tie tiks publicēti arī šeit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Citēt rakstu
 
Sākt jaunu pavedienu
Atbildes
Nulukkizdin
iesūtīt 11.02.2005 21:03
Raksts #2


Studē augstākās pārvērtības
****

Grupa: Izraidītie
Pievienojās: 29.05.04
Kur: Rīga



Here are the rules.. as far as we have got with them..


Latvia vs. Lithuania debating championship: The Rules

Teams

Each country has a team. In the team they have an equal number of main debaters (starters) and an unlimited number of subs. Teams select their captain, who will write the opening post for the team.

Starting the Debate

1. The judge decides on the topic of the debate and announces it in the debate thread. The teams have one week for preparation.
2. After a week, the time counting starts and the proposition team (the hosting team) is expected to post their opening statement within time limit.

The Debate

1. No IC, therefore no ‘spectators’ allowed. All out-of-context posts should be deleted without warning.
2. No editing of posts allowed.
3. After the judge has posted the topic and before posting their first posts, the team captains should post their rosters.
4. The teams post Prop, Op, Prop, Op…
5. It is up to the teams how they organize their arguments, but there are certain rules to be sticked to:

Prop 1st post, Op 1st post
Aim: Outlining Proposing/Opposing team's main arguments. Backing them up as much as space allows. The Opposing team cannot rebutt the arguments put forward in the Proposing team’s first post.
Prop 2nd, Op2nd (also 3rd) Aims: Backing up previously outlined arguments. Rebutting opposing teams arguments. Introducing new arguments. Only two rebuttals allowed in one team’s post. Opponent’s rebuttals can be rebutted.
Prop closing statement, Op closing statement
(Preferably written by the team captain) Aim: Enforce team's arguments. It may be done by summarizing your arguments, by rebutting the last rebuttals of the opponent or in some other way, but no new rebuttals can be made.

6. Colour codes may be used by the team to organize their posts. In this case, the codes should be posted at the beginning of each post. This section is not included in the word count.
7. Rebuttals should be separated from the main arguments. The team may choose whether to include headings “Main argument”, “Closing statement” etc., but headings “Rebuttal #1”, “Rebuttal #2” are required for the purpose of separation.
8. Time limit for the post to appear in the thread is 48 hours. In case a sub is called (which should be done openly in the thread), another 8 hours are added to the time remaining on the clock. The judge is expected to inform the debaters about the date and time their post is due.
9. Word limit is 2000 words for each main post and 500 words for the Closing Statement, excluding colour codes and all the formatting codes, including Headings and quotes.

Judgment

Every post (except the closing statements) is rated in the following categories, 5 point scale (5 - outstanding, 4 -very good, 3-ok, 2-somewhat lacking 1-poor 0-nonexistant)

*Creativity
*Staying on topic
*Team spirit/team unity
*Organisation (how easy it is to follow the author's thought)
*Choice of arguments and rebuttal points.

Plus, each team is rated in the following categories:

*Overall strategy (how well posts were organized to allocage enough space for arguments and rebuttals. How well the chances to rebut opponents arguments and rebuttals were used)
*Overall choice of arguments and rebuttal points
*Strength of the Closing Statement

Šo rakstu rediģēja Nulukkizdin: 11.02.2005 21:19
Go to the top of the page
 
+Citēt rakstu

Raksti šajā pavedienā


Atbildēt pavedienāSākt jaunu pavedienu
3 lietotāji/s lasa šo pavedienu (3 viesi un 0 anonīmie lietotāji)
0 biedri:

 



RSS Lo-Fi versija Pašlaik ir: 16.05.2024 08:39