![]() |
Laipni lūdzam, viesi ( Pieteikties | Reģistrēties )
Foruma pamatvaloda angļu. Ja nepieciešams, palīdzību tulkošanā vari lūgt modiem.
Communication on this forum basically in English.
Šiame forume bendraujama angliškai.
Käesolevas foorumis toimub suhtlus inglise keeles.
![]() |
![]()
Raksts
#1
|
|
Istari māceklis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Grupa: Biedri Pievienojās: 29.12.03 GP eksperts 2006 ![]() |
For everyone willing to participate in discussion about debate rules - the discussion is there
When the rules will be written, they will be posted here. ---------------------- Diskusija par debašu noteikumiem norisinās lietuviešu forumā. Ja vēlaties kaut ko piebilst - principā, varat jau to darīt arī šeit, iespējams, ka Nuluks pēc tam svarīgāko pārstāstīs tur. Kad noteikumi būs gatavi, tie tiks publicēti arī šeit. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Raksts
#2
|
|
Cep speķi Dūdijam ![]() Grupa: Biedri Pievienojās: 20.02.05 ![]() |
Hello! I'm Elk, if you're from the Plaza you'd know me (currently) as Turin.
To expand a bit on how I'd be judging - the rules are pretty straightforward, but to elaborate, I want to see fully reasoned out points. That is the essense of it all, to me. The first poster should introduce a number of arguments and support them as thoughroughly as s/he can, the second poster should continue in like fashion, and the 3rd should come in as a 'sweeper' and tie any loose ends, solidify eny arguments that might need more support, etc. A strong, authoritative ending should also be included. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi versija | Pašlaik ir: 13.05.2025 07:50 |